PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 42.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
185.19%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -54.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-3.23%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 6.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
49.40%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -65.25%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
430.95%
AR growth while MU is negative at -246.88%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-371.43%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 208.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
162.50%
AP growth of 162.50% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-82.87%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -119.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-517.39%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -314.89%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-8.03%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -7.42%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-21.36%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -134.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
21.36%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MU's 16233.33%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-33.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -317.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
15.29%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -28.26%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
68.13%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -2700.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-28.20%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -224.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
Issuance growth of 105.88% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4.18%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.