PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -12.95%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-2.95%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 15.42%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-95.65%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 39.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
30.00%
SBC growth well above MU's 2.94%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-265.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 26.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-169.06%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 234.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-81.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -90.91%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-460.00%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-400.00%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 225.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
96.35%
Well above MU's 92.08%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-52.12%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 18.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
1.60%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MU's 41.32%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -17.55%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
64.25%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -24.62%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
29.47%
Below 50% of MU's 233.33%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
103.45%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -4.36%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
132.18%
Investing outflow well above MU's 29.67%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -10.86%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
75.71%
Issuance growth of 75.71% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.01%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -2500.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.