205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.10%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -6.69%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-1.69%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -1.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-5800.00%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
7.69%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 40.00%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
46.99%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -411.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
74.03%
AR growth while MU is negative at -139.29%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
31.67%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 914.29%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
68.52%
AP growth of 68.52% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-12.90%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -617.78%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
471.43%
Well above MU's 75.00%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
34.65%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -21.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-1.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -27.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -114.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
39.84%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -8.79%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-11600.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -212.78%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-210.13%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -97.58%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.27%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
2.39%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -738.46%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.