PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -47.49%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.06%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 4.90%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
12.28%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 57.68%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-21.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -12.24%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
231.82%
Well above MU's 241.36% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 285.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
378.05%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -104.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Growth well above MU's 199.57%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -725.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.83%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 6.71%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-11.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 13.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
11.20%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -34.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
50.05%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -1.08%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
13.95%
Below 50% of MU's 150.83%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
-14.78%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 38.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
323.56%
Investing outflow well above MU's 28.50%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -148.48%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
-31.37%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 99.54%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.