PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -4.07%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-8.42%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
202.00%
Well above MU's 83.33% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-12.12%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -4.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
51.38%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -165.07%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
776.60%
AR growth while MU is negative at -69.57%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-29.82%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 1466.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.17%
AP growth of 104.17% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-85.61%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -181.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1175.00%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -78.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
1.49%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -22.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-17.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -140.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
17.99%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -128.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-129.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 61.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-55.41%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 14.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
56.06%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 132.44%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-273.52%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 69.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Issuance growth of 214.29% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
20.63%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -63800.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.