205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -56.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-4.60%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 3.63%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-52.94%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
24.14%
SBC growth well above MU's 12.20%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-206.15%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 236.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-131.45%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 430.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-242.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -331.71%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-479.49%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 256.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
129.30%
Well above MU's 77.97%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-54.34%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 8.74%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
24.39%
CapEx growth well above MU's 43.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -102.49%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
81.02%
Purchases well above MU's 10.47%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
105.95%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 21.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
94.83%
Growth well above MU's 29.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
184.89%
Investing outflow well above MU's 56.29%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 29.14%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-38.18%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-0.48%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 78.87%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.