PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -146.60%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.81%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-345.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 60.87%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.56%
Less SBC growth vs. MU's 19.57%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
101.29%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -111.33%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.00%
AR growth while MU is negative at -17.51%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
37.72%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -82.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
137.50%
AP growth of 137.50% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
177.03%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -49.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-60.32%
Negative yoy while MU is 546.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
63.71%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -31.87%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -23.13%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 66.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
34.44%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -13.22%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-4966.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 158.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-88.66%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 44.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
Issuance growth of 183.82% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
16.35%
Buyback growth below 50% of MU's 91.11%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.