PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -123.96%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.07%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -2.48%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-111.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 127.78%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-26.32%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -14.55%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4400.00%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -1108.70%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-28.95%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -130.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
195.77%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -80.35%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-76.92%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.26%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -77.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-72.00%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -31.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
32.18%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -49.02%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
12.03%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -38.23%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-12.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -65.69%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
1.51%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -27.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-57.44%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 57.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
7.89%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 25.32%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-1027.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -68.31%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x MU's 47.20%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-20.21%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.12%
Buyback growth below 50% of MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.