PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.16%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 20.93%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-4.22%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -4.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
66.40%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -2260.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.29%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -8.51%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
1.48%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 174.82%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
269.39%
AR growth well above MU's 95.95%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-73.53%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 109.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
555.56%
AP growth of 555.56% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-89.35%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 420.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2485.71%
Negative yoy while MU is 612.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.84%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 130.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
20.86%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -16.85%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-20.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 57.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-36.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 20.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
48.54%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -54.79%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
15.71%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -44.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-13.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -131.49%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.79%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.00%
Buyback growth of 5.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.