PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.78%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 205.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.32%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 7.64%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
121.43%
Well above MU's 86.11% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
41.67%
SBC growth well above MU's 6.98%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.09%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -51.44%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-140.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -13266.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-394.44%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 348.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-232.20%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-996.77%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -121.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
80.84%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -86.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.68%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 27.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-15.45%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 34.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 33.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.17%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -33.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
46.41%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -12.23%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
126.27%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -28.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
138.98%
Investing outflow well above MU's 37.59%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
75.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -3.87%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1441.67%
Issuance growth of 1441.67% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-15.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1200.00%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.