205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-73.23%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 43.84%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-0.44%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 4.47%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
8050.00%
Well above MU's 306.25% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-16.67%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
601.24%
Well above MU's 63.86% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
382.08%
AR growth well above MU's 44.60%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-225.64%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 12.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
48.94%
AP growth of 48.94% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
346.96%
Growth well above MU's 71.76%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
2900.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -213.74%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
12.02%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 33.07%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-24.19%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -20.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
24.19%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. MU's 72.03%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-19.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -91.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-14.13%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -51.13%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-25.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -22.60%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-84.02%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -48.68%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.16%
Issuance growth of 113.16% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-8.62%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.