205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.86%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 23.64%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.75%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 5.18%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
103.23%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -101.81%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
5.71%
SBC growth well above MU's 1.96%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
132.91%
Well above MU's 49.16% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
44.89%
AR growth while MU is negative at -320.66%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
40.21%
Inventory growth well above MU's 32.43%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
111.76%
AP growth of 111.76% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
306.80%
Growth well above MU's 50.79%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
17.65%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -41.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
64.21%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 19.58%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-31.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -9.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.79%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -61.08%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-5.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -78.41%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-5975.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -113.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-130.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -67.99%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.70%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-16.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -91.30%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.