PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.74%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MU's 15.46%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
4.29%
D&A growth well above MU's 6.71%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-5300.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 4933.33%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-37.84%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -7.69%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
94.19%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -354.93%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
64.95%
AR growth while MU is negative at -7.47%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
55.17%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -636.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
750.00%
AP growth of 750.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
1.97%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -317.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
95.24%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -275.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.33%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -2.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-48.59%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -6.44%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
48.59%
Some acquisitions while MU is negative at -90.80%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-155.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 51.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
24.73%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -11.11%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-58.02%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 286.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-2082.72%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -433.54%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-46.08%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-17.88%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 95.45%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.