205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.08%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 13.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.47%
D&A growth well above MU's 4.14%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
55.77%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -116.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-8.70%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -2.08%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
104.98%
Well above MU's 66.87% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1211.76%
AR growth while MU is negative at -1.83%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-288.46%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -22.83%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-125.49%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
13.87%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 87.90%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
1150.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -330.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
1.85%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 20.98%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
12.70%
CapEx growth well above MU's 5.81%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-12.70%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 373.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
89.25%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -59.38%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
26.12%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 15.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
15.36%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -3.48%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
185.12%
Investing outflow well above MU's 5.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.91%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-67.42%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.