PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -23.81%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.61%
D&A growth well above MU's 3.44%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
117.39%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -33.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
45.24%
SBC growth well above MU's 29.79%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-174.23%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 115.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-161.64%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 133.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
185.15%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -26.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-415.38%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-169.12%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 452.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
19.05%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 145.86%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-48.39%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -6.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
22.29%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -18.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 2561.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
55.26%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -702.75%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.77%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -7.43%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
96.62%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -969.59%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-22.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -107.94%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-48.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 83.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
297.37%
Issuance growth of 297.37% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
42.66%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -91700.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.