PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
7.23%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -50.70%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.49%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -2.14%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
675.00%
Well above MU's 325.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
9.84%
SBC growth while MU is negative at -6.56%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
139.52%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 608.16%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
109.01%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. MU's 435.98%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-39.53%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -79.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
61.19%
AP growth of 61.19% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
154.92%
Growth well above MU's 157.01%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-320.00%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -87.95%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
62.24%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -28.59%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-13.15%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 1.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.40%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 74.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-87.37%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 202.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-1890.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 111.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-121.99%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 43.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x MU's 77.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
-3.31%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
25.09%
Buyback growth below 50% of MU's 60.13%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.