PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.20%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -47.63%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
3.00%
D&A growth well above MU's 3.47%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-112.90%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 326.39%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.36%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 1.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
24.31%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -55.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
266.67%
AR growth well above MU's 15.60%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-25.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -0.19%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
211.54%
AP growth of 211.54% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-40.30%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -22.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
141.82%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -390.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
10.91%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -21.08%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
47.54%
CapEx growth well above MU's 9.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-47.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -230.68%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-312.55%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -140.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
10.00%
Below 50% of MU's 225.12%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
32.42%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. MU's 94.24%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-254.26%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 17.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.88%
Issuance growth of 32.88% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
47.16%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of MU's 78.28%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.