PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
17.55%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -19.88%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.40%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 5.32%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
11.76%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. MU's 100.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
9.52%
SBC growth well above MU's 18.06%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
106.69%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -11.59%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
157.85%
AR growth well above MU's 250.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-6550.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -251.43%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
23.73%
AP growth of 23.73% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
87.54%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 3827.27%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
125.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -107.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
102.12%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -0.50%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.25%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -5.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.46%
Purchases well above MU's 60.93%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
10.50%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -62.55%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-2380.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 640.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
73.97%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -43.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
33.24%
Debt repayment well below MU's 81.55%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
-40.41%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
46.25%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MU's 21.35%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.