PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 97.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.40%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 4.18%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-70.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -3.53%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-630.56%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -327.59%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-254.29%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -281.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
148.12%
Inventory growth well above MU's 26.04%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-117.81%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
40.91%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -132.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
100.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 4300.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-16.10%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-12.31%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 5.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
12.31%
Acquisition growth of 12.31% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-920.08%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -42.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-71.82%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -51.04%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-28.23%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -89.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-252.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -14.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -900.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
41.38%
Issuance growth of 41.38% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
98.30%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MU's 37.14%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.