PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.76%
Net income growth similar to MU's 22.98%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-2.80%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 10.20%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
56.86%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-16.00%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 8.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
238.74%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -17.27%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
89.81%
AR growth well above MU's 53.63%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
82.81%
Some inventory rise while MU is negative at -3.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
123.08%
AP growth of 123.08% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
742.31%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -37.31%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-384.38%
Both negative yoy, with MU at -71.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
47.26%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x MU's 12.26%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-45.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -17.28%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
45.21%
Acquisition growth of 45.21% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
7.44%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -368.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
211.18%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 127.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
-45.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 1487.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.50%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -40.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.32%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.