205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
3.85%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -18.89%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-0.82%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with MU at -5.11%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
136.36%
Deferred tax of 136.36% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
45.24%
SBC growth well above MU's 3.37%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-179.62%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -13.70%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-672.73%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 195.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-44.44%
Negative yoy inventory while MU is 142.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
2200.00%
AP growth of 2200.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-204.79%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -185.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
97.80%
Well above MU's 108.33%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-12.94%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -13.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-45.28%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -20.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-18.33%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 5.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
26.02%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -45.51%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
91.81%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -51.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-11.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -24.84%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-10.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -5.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
71.93%
Issuance growth of 71.93% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -18.75%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.