PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 187.73%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
2.43%
D&A growth well above MU's 0.52%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1300.00%
Deferred tax of 1300.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-27.54%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -1.03%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
336.76%
Slight usage while MU is negative at -137.22%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-785.71%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -409.57%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-132.50%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -65.93%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
305.88%
AP growth of 305.88% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
339.29%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -280.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
108.77%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 8000.00%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
14.47%
Operating cash flow growth at 75-90% of MU's 16.45%. Bill Ackman would recommend further refinements to match competitor’s CFO gains.
-25.91%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 25.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
25.91%
Acquisition growth of 25.91% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.27%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -64.27%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-46.44%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -13.57%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-34.57%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 19.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-796.06%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 18.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.89%
Issuance growth of 38.89% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.79%
We have some buyback growth while MU is negative at -614.29%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.