205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.81%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 56.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-15.81%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-133.33%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 4300.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-129.19%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -62.05%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
22.58%
AR growth while MU is negative at -26.69%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-261.54%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -71.89%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-254.29%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-49.25%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -11.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
40.00%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -112.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-2.92%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 9.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-163.79%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 10.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-86.01%
Negative yoy acquisition while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-118.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -118.25%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
105.93%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x MU's 6.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
94.86%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -1185.14%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-152.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -21.77%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
63.21%
Debt repayment at 50-75% of MU's 85.82%. Martin Whitman would worry about partial lag if competitor gains advantage from lower debt burdens.
-30.67%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-2.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -762.67%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.