PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.95%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -15.22%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.47%
Less D&A growth vs. MU's 3.08%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
75.00%
Well above MU's 22.73% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
48.00%
SBC growth well above MU's 26.88%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-572.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 46.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-95.83%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 106.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-219.15%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -761.54%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
120.37%
A yoy AP increase while MU is negative at -108.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-181.37%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 109.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-500.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 191.53%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-9.04%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
65.44%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -62.03%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-97.06%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -55.68%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
-7.87%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 57.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
2.44%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -28.24%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
50.00%
Growth well above MU's 98.84%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
25.17%
Investing outflow well above MU's 1.93%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -1007.39%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
9.62%
Issuance growth of 9.62% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-314.79%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 79.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.