205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with MU at -113.07%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
6.84%
D&A growth well above MU's 2.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
95.38%
Deferred tax of 95.38% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
67.74%
SBC growth well above MU's 7.35%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-9488.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -314.35%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-87.59%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 68.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-50.42%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -64.28%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-464.71%
Both negative yoy AP, with MU at -391.71%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-236.97%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 88.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
1.59%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. MU's 88.61%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-43.19%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -75.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-1.55%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 32.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.30%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. MU's 78.10%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
10.30%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -7.89%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
81.82%
Growth well above MU's 53.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
102.73%
Investing outflow well above MU's 40.74%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-274.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
70.00%
Issuance growth of 70.00% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
87.85%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x MU's 45.79%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.