PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.82%
Some net income increase while MU is negative at -1085.64%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
6.76%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-550.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
6.73%
SBC growth well above MU's 7.53%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
40.90%
Well above MU's 4.50% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-538.89%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -42.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
16.95%
Inventory growth well above MU's 29.35%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
159.68%
AP growth well above MU's 30.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
71.68%
Growth well above MU's 77.78%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-177.42%
Negative yoy while MU is 8022.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.60%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -63.63%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-47.25%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 9.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.32%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -125.56%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-23.87%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 13.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
1150.00%
Growth well above MU's 192.13%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-8617.86%
We reduce yoy invests while MU stands at 15.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
64.21%
We repay more while MU is negative at -65.00%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-23.53%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
23.30%
Buyback growth below 50% of MU's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.