PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.75%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
6.67%
D&A growth well above MU's 0.72%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-90.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-28.83%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -7.64%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
98.82%
Well above MU's 24.02% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
74.68%
AR growth while MU is negative at -117.04%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
59.41%
Inventory growth well above MU's 57.46%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-63.51%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 104.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
359.38%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. MU's 2075.00%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
61.63%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -94.46%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
38.46%
Some CFO growth while MU is negative at -93.00%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-3.39%
Negative yoy CapEx while MU is 29.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.89%
Purchases growth of 23.89% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-5.87%
We reduce yoy sales while MU is 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-111.90%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -1802.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
28.97%
Investing outflow well above MU's 38.38%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while MU is negative at -1878.79%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
4.62%
Issuance growth of 4.62% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
41.77%
Buyback growth of 41.77% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.