205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.78%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 24.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.31%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -0.97%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-41.41%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-13.92%
Negative yoy SBC while MU is 2.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
4766.67%
Well above MU's 31.32% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
1045.00%
AR growth well above MU's 119.23%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
49.16%
Inventory growth well above MU's 70.78%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-137.04%
Both negative yoy AP, with MU at -1196.77%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
15.66%
Some yoy usage while MU is negative at -181.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
112.12%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -167.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-0.67%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 937.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.21%
CapEx growth well above MU's 6.41%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-400.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -6.41%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
16.72%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -11.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
18.23%
We have some liquidation growth while MU is negative at -4.77%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-20.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while MU is 28.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
81.64%
Investing outflow well above MU's 29.66%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.82%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-41.30%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.