PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.77%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 13.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
7.42%
Some D&A expansion while MU is negative at -1.14%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
49.29%
Some yoy growth while MU is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
55.88%
SBC growth well above MU's 27.03%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-227.14%
Negative yoy working capital usage while MU is 201.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-38.62%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with MU at -1531.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
7.69%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 174.50%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-670.00%
Negative yoy AP while MU is 179.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-261.98%
Negative yoy usage while MU is 1004.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-1650.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 235.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-47.14%
Negative yoy CFO while MU is 462.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-8.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -22.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
6500.00%
Acquisition spending well above MU's 22.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-89.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while MU stands at 12.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-22.87%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -6.27%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-566.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -72.95%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-970.42%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -87.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-57.09%
We cut debt repayment yoy while MU is 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
44.44%
Issuance growth of 44.44% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
95.38%
Buyback growth of 95.38% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.