205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.07%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 167.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
8.21%
D&A growth well above MU's 1.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
36.36%
Deferred tax of 36.36% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-10.34%
Both cut yoy SBC, with MU at -2.74%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
738.30%
Less working capital growth vs. MU's 1525.00%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
194.70%
AR growth while MU is negative at -26.90%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-21.58%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with MU at -433.82%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
569.23%
AP growth well above MU's 291.58%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
7.12%
Growth well above MU's 14.11%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
103.13%
Some yoy increase while MU is negative at -100.49%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
15.36%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of MU's 37.19%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
9.42%
Some CapEx rise while MU is negative at -49.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.73%
Some yoy expansion while MU is negative at -37.83%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with MU at -48.94%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
10542.31%
Growth well above MU's 127.27%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
226.08%
We have mild expansions while MU is negative at -79.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
90.85%
Debt repayment similar to MU's 88.67%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
-25.64%
Negative yoy issuance while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-68.87%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.