205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-2.16%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 110.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.53%
Negative yoy D&A while MU is 2.22%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-314.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
48.72%
SBC growth well above MU's 3.29%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-341.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -428.84%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-198.60%
AR is negative yoy while MU is 19.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
30.74%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 146.83%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
-239.08%
Both negative yoy AP, with MU at -122.54%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-200.33%
Both reduce yoy usage, with MU at -125.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-6000.00%
Negative yoy while MU is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-57.51%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with MU at -4.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
5.79%
Lower CapEx growth vs. MU's 100.00%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.82%
Purchases well above MU's 57.59%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.34%
We have some outflow growth while MU is negative at -6498.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
104.07%
Investing outflow well above MU's 12.51%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-150.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with MU at -3.70%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
35.63%
Issuance growth of 35.63% while MU is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-21.60%
We cut yoy buybacks while MU is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.