205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.78%
Negative net income growth while NXPI stands at 808.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
1.32%
D&A growth well above NXPI's 0.75%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
121.43%
Well above NXPI's 132.47% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
41.67%
SBC growth while NXPI is negative at -17.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-274.09%
Negative yoy working capital usage while NXPI is 385.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-140.96%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with NXPI at -94.03%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-394.44%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with NXPI at -216.67%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-232.20%
Negative yoy AP while NXPI is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-996.77%
Negative yoy usage while NXPI is 1013.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
80.84%
Some yoy increase while NXPI is negative at -15580.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-42.68%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with NXPI at -15.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-15.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with NXPI at -18.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while NXPI stands at 1336.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
43.17%
Purchases growth of 43.17% while NXPI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
46.41%
Liquidation growth of 46.41% while NXPI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
126.27%
Growth well above NXPI's 99.45%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
138.98%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. NXPI's 1646.50%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
75.00%
We repay more while NXPI is negative at -1207.18%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
1441.67%
Issuance growth of 1441.67% while NXPI is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-15.79%
We cut yoy buybacks while NXPI is 58.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.