205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-8.06%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ON at -40.80%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Well above ON's 15.82% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -78.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above ON's 43.46%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-107.78%
Negative yoy while ON is 77.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
34.22%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -23.65%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-63.53%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -31.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.10%
Purchases growth of 32.10% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
5.39%
Liquidation growth of 5.39% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-32.70%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 29.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
26.41%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -21.04%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.42%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. ON's 2850.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
35.29%
Buyback growth of 35.29% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.