205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
20.16%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 92.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
4.09%
Some D&A expansion while ON is negative at -5.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
600.00%
Well above ON's 12.50% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.53%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -187.50%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth well above ON's 54.91%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
16.46%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -23.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with ON at -112.15%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-2988.89%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -2.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.75%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 61.28%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
11.22%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ON's 40.85%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-14.43%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
13.68%
Liquidation growth of 13.68% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
7.96%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. ON's 53.27%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
Debt repayment similar to ON's 93.90%. Walter Schloss sees parallel liability management or similar free cash flow availability.
64.29%
We slightly raise equity while ON is negative at -99.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
34.30%
Buyback growth of 34.30% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.