PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
308.03%
Net income growth above 1.5x ON's 67.08%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-1.58%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ON at -25.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-13.89%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 26.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-34.38%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -25.16%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while ON is negative at -23.76%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-56.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -228.40%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth well above ON's 93.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-804.76%
Negative yoy usage while ON is 93.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-2998.00%
Negative yoy while ON is 3550.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
14.72%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 60.79%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
8.33%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -241.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
84.18%
Acquisition growth of 84.18% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-165.98%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-15.46%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ON at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
49700.00%
Growth well above ON's 500.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
146.91%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -265.26%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
11.58%
Debt repayment growth of 11.58% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-3.52%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 1315.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
27.99%
Buyback growth of 27.99% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.