PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.22%
Net income growth similar to ON's 17.22%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
1.03%
Less D&A growth vs. ON's 2.16%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
70.93%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -101.13%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -39.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-153.57%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -422.73%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth well above ON's 52.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
60.21%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -217.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
686.67%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -200.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
62.09%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -12.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
2.79%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ON's 43.67%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-74.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
51.73%
Liquidation growth of 51.73% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-200.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -37.93%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-188.64%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 44.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.86%
We slightly raise equity while ON is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
13.42%
Buyback growth of 13.42% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.