PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1429.41%
Net income growth above 1.5x ON's 93.43%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-2.92%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ON at -1.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
100.00%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -133.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-6.00%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 26.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
80.61%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -3.85%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
46.79%
AR growth while ON is negative at -1448.72%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-86.74%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -10.14%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
100.00%
AP growth well above ON's 180.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
250.00%
Growth well above ON's 185.48%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-23.08%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -21.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
121.91%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 103.14%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-11.63%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 34.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
50.96%
Acquisition growth of 50.96% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-55.86%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-19.81%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.88%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 33.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ON's 13.65%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
5.56%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. ON's 20.00%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
-147.52%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 87.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.