205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
21.75%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 123.53%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-2.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ON at -2.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-7.04%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 245.45%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-6.52%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -11.85%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
56.25%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -207.55%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
183.87%
AR growth while ON is negative at -88.78%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-62.26%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -1157.14%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -93.27%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
255.56%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -7.98%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
20.02%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 16.78%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-92.92%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 4.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.01%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. ON's 91.10%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
300.00%
We have some liquidation growth while ON is negative at -200.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.47%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. ON's 96.17%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
Issuance growth of 11.76% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-40.24%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 12.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.