205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
0.46%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -6.87%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
0.45%
Less D&A growth vs. ON's 4.47%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-116.67%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 43.75%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
9.30%
SBC growth well above ON's 15.13%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-1385.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while ON is 53.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-260.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -73.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
13.95%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.86%
Growth well above ON's 223.38%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -65.33%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-29.07%
Negative yoy CFO while ON is 7.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
49.77%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -299.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.02%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. ON's 377.50%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
24.03%
Below 50% of ON's 405.37%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
92.17%
We have mild expansions while ON is negative at -1815.15%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-43.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -5.56%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.