205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
11.70%
Net income growth similar to ON's 11.06%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
-1.75%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 5.21%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-285.71%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 72.73%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.08%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -20.78%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
148.85%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -334.62%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
84.57%
AR growth while ON is negative at -42.37%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
9.59%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -84.39%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
100.00%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -89.42%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
8100.00%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -230.43%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.52%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -22.22%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-39.93%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 1.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
Purchases growth of 1.63% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-64.00%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-424.51%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 32.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.00%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
20.00%
Buyback growth of 20.00% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.