205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-29.30%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.94%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 18.65%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
121.68%
Well above ON's 218.52% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
21.28%
SBC growth while ON is negative at -7.14%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-268.71%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -214.16%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-118.57%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -57.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-73.63%
Negative yoy inventory while ON is 243.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-239.39%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -66.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
100.00%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -107.87%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-58.05%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -21.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
35.55%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -96.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while ON is negative at -57700.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-24.54%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
153.36%
Liquidation growth of 153.36% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 295.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
111.50%
Investing outflow well above ON's 97.11%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.95%
We slightly raise equity while ON is negative at -100.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
-28.50%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -58.33%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.