205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
37.12%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 117.02%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-1.26%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ON at -15.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
120.83%
Well above ON's 107.69% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
17.19%
SBC growth of 17.19% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-153.88%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -75.66%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-129.40%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -115.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-37.36%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -118.15%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-209.91%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 72.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-292.59%
Negative yoy usage while ON is 177.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
99.15%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -103.38%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-66.82%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -37.63%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
12.50%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ON's 34.18%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.91%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. ON's 50.41%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
9.86%
We have some liquidation growth while ON is negative at -17.32%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.64%
Investing outflow well above ON's 88.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
241.35%
Issuance growth of 241.35% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-13.17%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 93.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.