205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-4.70%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 8.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-1.96%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 1.15%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
155.56%
Well above ON's 110.14% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-5.33%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -33.96%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
131.94%
Well above ON's 15.95% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
81.25%
AR growth well above ON's 69.78%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
70.00%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -12.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
52.78%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -115.97%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
261.70%
Growth well above ON's 2.59%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
833.33%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -59.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
70.77%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ON's 8.51%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-27.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -6.77%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
27.84%
Acquisition growth of 27.84% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
58.49%
Purchases well above ON's 79.08%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-69.92%
Both yoy lines are negative, with ON at -37.87%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-24.74%
We reduce yoy other investing while ON is 120.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-168.39%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 66.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ON's 11.54%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
1.75%
Issuance growth of 1.75% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-1.80%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -180.85%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.