205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.12%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with ON at -94.05%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.97%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 12.75%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
185.19%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. ON's 1550.00%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
-3.23%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 15.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
49.40%
Less working capital growth vs. ON's 158.80%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
430.95%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. ON's 2780.00%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
-371.43%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -73.05%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
162.50%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -350.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-82.87%
Negative yoy usage while ON is 146.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-517.39%
Negative yoy while ON is 107.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-8.03%
Negative yoy CFO while ON is 76.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-21.36%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 37.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
21.36%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. ON's 99.82%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
-33.10%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -3060.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
15.29%
Liquidation growth of 15.29% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
68.13%
Growth well above ON's 104.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-28.20%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 87.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.88%
Issuance growth of 105.88% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-4.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -210.92%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.