205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-20.48%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 2132.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-2.95%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 7.38%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-95.65%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
30.00%
SBC growth while ON is negative at -11.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-265.34%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -393.20%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-169.06%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with ON at -155.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-81.82%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with ON at -20.07%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-460.00%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 78.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-400.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -142.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
96.35%
Some yoy increase while ON is negative at -58.58%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-52.12%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with ON at -48.62%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
1.60%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -56.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -383.33%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
64.25%
Purchases well above ON's 94.94%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
29.47%
Below 50% of ON's 600.00%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
103.45%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. ON's 422.22%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
132.18%
Investing outflow well above ON's 1.81%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x ON's 2.03%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
75.71%
Issuance growth of 75.71% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
4.01%
We have some buyback growth while ON is negative at -33.43%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.