205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
14.66%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -8.95%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.06%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
12.28%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -96.40%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-21.43%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -22.70%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
231.82%
Well above ON's 45.96% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-17.50%
AR is negative yoy while ON is 59.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
378.05%
Some inventory rise while ON is negative at -215.15%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-41.18%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 165.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
358.10%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -39.77%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-23.08%
Negative yoy while ON is 831.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.83%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x ON's 26.28%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-11.20%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 14.57%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
11.20%
Acquisition growth of 11.20% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
50.05%
Some yoy expansion while ON is negative at -200.00%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
13.95%
We have some liquidation growth while ON is negative at -70.00%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-14.78%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -155.56%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
323.56%
Investing outflow well above ON's 1.10%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-200.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ON is 93.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-31.37%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-20.80%
We cut yoy buybacks while ON is 20.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.