205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
4.76%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 17.52%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-8.42%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
202.00%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -1960.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-12.12%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -2.75%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
51.38%
Well above ON's 64.67% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
776.60%
AR growth well above ON's 626.21%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
-29.82%
Negative yoy inventory while ON is 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
104.17%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -288.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-85.61%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -375.61%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-1175.00%
Negative yoy while ON is 36.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
1.49%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of ON's 22.53%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-17.99%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -4.50%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
17.99%
Some acquisitions while ON is negative at -194.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-129.63%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 600.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-55.41%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
56.06%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. ON's 4340.00%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-273.52%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 7.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-33.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while ON is 26.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
214.29%
Issuance growth of 214.29% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
20.63%
Buyback growth below 50% of ON's 80.60%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.