205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.56%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -29.12%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.81%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with ON at -1.36%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-345.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 90.91%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
5.56%
Less SBC growth vs. ON's 38.79%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
101.29%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -6.24%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.00%
AR growth while ON is negative at -10240.00%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
37.72%
Inventory growth well above ON's 71.48%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
137.50%
Lower AP growth vs. ON's 294.55%, indicating prompt payments. David Dodd would confirm no lost opportunity in interest-free credit if expansions are underfunded.
177.03%
Growth well above ON's 135.05%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-60.32%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -7.09%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
63.71%
Some CFO growth while ON is negative at -9.31%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-27.42%
Negative yoy CapEx while ON is 28.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-396.50%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
34.44%
Liquidation growth of 34.44% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-4966.67%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -3252.38%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-88.66%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -66.95%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
183.82%
Issuance growth of 183.82% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
16.35%
Buyback growth below 50% of ON's 97.50%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.