205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
24.26%
Some net income increase while ON is negative at -58.91%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.07%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 5.28%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-111.86%
Negative yoy deferred tax while ON stands at 2866.67%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-26.32%
Both cut yoy SBC, with ON at -11.80%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
4400.00%
Well above ON's 232.28% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-28.95%
AR is negative yoy while ON is 181.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
195.77%
Inventory growth well above ON's 112.99%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-76.92%
Negative yoy AP while ON is 116.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
155.26%
Some yoy usage while ON is negative at -297.06%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-72.00%
Both negative yoy, with ON at -488.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
32.18%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x ON's 27.35%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
12.03%
Lower CapEx growth vs. ON's 30.96%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
-12.03%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
1.51%
Purchases growth of 1.51% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-57.44%
We reduce yoy sales while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
7.89%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. ON's 135.20%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-1027.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with ON at -1749.24%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while ON is negative at -9925.64%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-20.21%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.12%
We have some buyback growth while ON is negative at -1000.00%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.