205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.16%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 953.77%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-4.22%
Negative yoy D&A while ON is 43.20%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
66.40%
Some yoy growth while ON is negative at -266.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-14.29%
Negative yoy SBC while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
1.48%
Slight usage while ON is negative at -13.82%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
269.39%
AR growth while ON is negative at -9.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-73.53%
Negative yoy inventory while ON is 2480.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
555.56%
A yoy AP increase while ON is negative at -39.66%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
-89.35%
Both reduce yoy usage, with ON at -295.52%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-2485.71%
Negative yoy while ON is 137.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-1.84%
Negative yoy CFO while ON is 72.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
20.86%
Some CapEx rise while ON is negative at -47.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-20.86%
Negative yoy acquisition while ON stands at 99.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-36.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
48.54%
Liquidation growth of 48.54% while ON is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
15.71%
We have some outflow growth while ON is negative at -103.86%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-13.60%
We reduce yoy invests while ON stands at 97.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-107.79%
Negative yoy issuance while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
5.00%
Buyback growth below 50% of ON's 13.64%. Michael Burry suspects fewer capital returns to shareholders vs. competitor, unless expansions hold higher ROI.